Judgment · High Court · 2011
Judgment
11161-1(01. RT LE6th’3ER1(FS ( OMMITTIE DH%R 411) BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT 1 111 1II(,T-1 (0I RI 01 KARN%F41 “ (IR(t 11314 %( I )I’RW Al) DATED THIS THE 241ff DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011 NI’\)RP’iTl\ THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KPATIL ND SRI ILL. PATIL, MEMBER \1FM)31 3()1 ‘UO)LMV) bk da1atNo 1-’ 2011 BErWEIs’i Sr o irabh Kulk h ni o MW und Kull arr \p I R c (hataprib a ‘ears Oct. Dc flr 1 1 liii Per )st Betaur I U 2 C C C I t C l C ) C C C 3 C - U l C ) J 0 C 4 . 7 7 0 ) , ( C M C l f n i r . M O C . 7 C . + - - C 7 C ) N 0 3 7 C 7 C i c 7 ) C l C . . 7 C 0 7 ) 3 0 o t * ) I C C C C t C N Q C C ) C c N C C “ — 7 C C I $ C C $ C C C C i c C t ” 1 C C 2 D R H 7 $ 7 $ 2 > $ 2 c 7 2 C 0 H D Q — . 2 C — C 0 C • C0 . - 9 . E i c M C ) C — C C , ’ _ C C C . C 3 = 7 C — 7 7 c o 7 0 : m • H — C 0 2 — C t r 3 1 C = C : r 2i 2 >7 C 2 C C 7 i c 1 “ C C 2 7 C 2 2 7 C i - C : 3 7o ± ± 2 $ , 7 t r C — 2 C i i C C l $ i c 7 ) I C 2 . H ? 4 p i D c C D C D C i D c C i D c C D C D C D P t r D P t D H r P D BP D C t r . 4 - D C D C i c t r i c D C i c D P D C D C D P D C i Dc C t r D C D C D C t r t - r DBC D C 4 r t H - : 4 - D C D C D C i Dc P D C i c D C D C i c D C • i Dc P D C D P - 4 f f i c D P D C D P ? D C ( 5 D C i c c t r D C D P D C D C 4 4 4 D C ( 0 F H 4 1 H i c D P D C B E P — t r D C D P r — D P t r D C D C 5 L E “ ‘ D P B D C D P D P t r ” 5 D C 5 D P 4 1 ( D C D C . — ” - 4 H ” 5 D C H H t i c H ” 5 D P t r i c D P D C B D C t r D C D C D C D C D C — 4 - t r D C D C B L E 3 ” 5 D P ” 5 D P D C D C D C - , C P C 4- : C ( D C D P D P D P “ - D C D P D P F r i c D C H i c D C : B D C C c = D P D P i c . i c L E S 4 p ” 5 t r D P D C t r i c D C D C ” - 4 4 - B D P i c H D C D C D C 2 D P i c i c D C D P B D P t I 4 - - i : c D C D C D C D C 5 H i c L E D C • i D C D P i c 5 D C D P D C D C D C t r D C D C D C D C H D C i c D P D P : 4 p D C i c L E D C D BC D C . • ” c c D C -C D B 4 - 4 i c D C i c D P L o E D C D C D C — D C o D C D P D C o i c < S E t r i c D C D C o D P D C . i c S 4 - D C D C D P . . L E = D P ? D D I — i c D C B i c L E i c D C D P D C D P D P * 1 i c L E — D C D C D P D C D C C . . t — r D C D C D C D C t r D P t r D P t r D C D P t r D C D C - D C c H D C D C D P D P D P D P B t - D C D C D P 4 - i c t r D C i c S D C D C * i c 4 5 D C t I t r i c D C i c D P t r D C I D D i c D C i c . o B t I . 4 + D C i 4 c _ . 4 H D C I ) r C D C D C i c H D C D C * r t r D C D C “ * r 1 L E • 5 i c H D C ? L D — i Dc C L E t r H D C D BP L E D C D C D C D C D C + D C D C D P t r L E — ‘ t r — 4 - D C D C + r t 5 r D C - t r 4 4 D C 1 r D C D P D C . 4 — r D C C D D P D P D C D C . ” 5 D C D C D P D C D C t D r D C P * - DB C 4 • •‘ 0 4
Accordingly, the Judnent and Award dated:
31.05.2005 passed in MVC No.2426/200 1 on the file of the Pri. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and MACT. Belgaum. stands modified in terms of the Joint Memo. The entire enhanced amount shall be released in favour of the appellant immediately on deposit by the Insurer. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/a JUDGE We BMV*
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.