✦ Karnataka High Court · 24 Feb 2011

Judgment · High Court · 2011

Judgment

Judgment

11161-1(01. RT LE6th’3ER1(FS ( OMMITTIE DH%R 411) BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT 1 111 1II(,T-1 (0I RI 01 KARN%F41 “ (IR(t 11314 %( I )I’RW Al) DATED THIS THE 241ff DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011 NI’\)RP’iTl\ THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KPATIL ND SRI ILL. PATIL, MEMBER \1FM)31 3()1 ‘UO)LMV) bk da1atNo 1-’ 2011 BErWEIs’i Sr o irabh Kulk h ni o MW und Kull arr \p I R c (hataprib a ‘ears Oct. Dc flr 1 1 liii Per )st Betaur I U 2 C C C I t C l C ) C C C 3 C - U l C ) J 0 C 4 . 7 7 0 ) , ( C M C l f n i r . M O C . 7 C . + - - C 7 C ) N 0 3 7 C 7 C i c 7 ) C l C . . 7 C 0 7 ) 3 0 o t * ) I C C C C t C N Q C C ) C c N C C “ — 7 C C I $ C C $ C C C C i c C t ” 1 C C 2 D R H 7 $ 7 $ 2 > $ 2 c 7 2 C 0 H D Q — . 2 C — C 0 C • C0 . - 9 . E i c M C ) C — C C , ’ _ C C C . C 3 = 7 C — 7 7 c o 7 0 : m • H — C 0 2 — C t r 3 1 C = C : r 2i 2 >7 C 2 C C 7 i c 1 “ C C 2 7 C 2 2 7 C i - C : 3 7o ± ± 2 $ , 7 t r C — 2 C i i C C l $ i c 7 ) I C 2 . H ? 4 p i D c C D C D C i D c C i D c C D C D C D P t r D P t D H r P D BP D C t r . 4 - D C D C i c t r i c D C i c D P D C D C D P D C i Dc C t r D C D C D C t r t - r DBC D C 4 r t H - : 4 - D C D C D C i Dc P D C i c D C D C i c D C • i Dc P D C D P - 4 f f i c D P D C D P ? D C ( 5 D C i c c t r D C D P D C D C 4 4 4 D C ( 0 F H 4 1 H i c D P D C B E P — t r D C D P r — D P t r D C D C 5 L E “ ‘ D P B D C D P D P t r ” 5 D C 5 D P 4 1 ( D C D C . — ” - 4 H ” 5 D C H H t i c H ” 5 D P t r i c D P D C B D C t r D C D C D C D C D C — 4 - t r D C D C B L E 3 ” 5 D P ” 5 D P D C D C D C - , C P C 4- : C ( D C D P D P D P “ - D C D P D P F r i c D C H i c D C : B D C C c = D P D P i c . i c L E S 4 p ” 5 t r D P D C t r i c D C D C ” - 4 4 - B D P i c H D C D C D C 2 D P i c i c D C D P B D P t I 4 - - i : c D C D C D C D C 5 H i c L E D C • i D C D P i c 5 D C D P D C D C D C t r D C D C D C D C H D C i c D P D P : 4 p D C i c L E D C D BC D C . • ” c c D C -C D B 4 - 4 i c D C i c D P L o E D C D C D C — D C o D C D P D C o i c < S E t r i c D C D C o D P D C . i c S 4 - D C D C D P . . L E = D P ? D D I — i c D C B i c L E i c D C D P D C D P D P * 1 i c L E — D C D C D P D C D C C . . t — r D C D C D C D C t r D P t r D P t r D C D P t r D C D C - D C c H D C D C D P D P D P D P B t - D C D C D P 4 - i c t r D C i c S D C D C * i c 4 5 D C t I t r i c D C i c D P t r D C I D D i c D C i c . o B t I . 4 + D C i 4 c _ . 4 H D C I ) r C D C D C i c H D C D C * r t r D C D C “ * r 1 L E • 5 i c H D C ? L D — i Dc C L E t r H D C D BP L E D C D C D C D C D C + D C D C D P t r L E — ‘ t r — 4 - D C D C + r t 5 r D C - t r 4 4 D C 1 r D C D P D C . 4 — r D C C D D P D P D C D C . ” 5 D C D C D P D C D C t D r D C P * - DB C 4 • •‘ 0 4

#5. Accordingly, the Judnent and Award dated:

31.05.2005 passed in MVC No.2426/200 1 on the file of the Pri. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and MACT. Belgaum. stands modified in terms of the Joint Memo. The entire enhanced amount shall be released in favour of the appellant immediately on deposit by the Insurer. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/a JUDGE We BMV*

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments