Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the
Judgment
PARASURAM JANAGIRI AGED 29 YEARS 5/0 SRI RAMAPPA SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOW, DEPARTMENT OF AGROFORESTRY COLLEGE OF FORESTRY SIRSI-58 1401 (BY SRI SHRIPATI B 5, ADV) AND: I. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, AGRICULTURE AND HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT 4” FLOOR, M S BUILDING. DRAMF3EDKAR VEEDHI. BANGALOREO I I
THE REX ISTRAR FNTvERSRV OF SCFNC GJLVK CAMPUS BANGALORIU5 TUE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL T
SCIENCES, G.KV.K. CAMPUS BAN GALORE 5 IVIISVIDHYAA ASSISTANT HORTICULTURAL OFFICER LALBAGH EL\N GALORE SRI NATRAJ PARASAMMAR AT PA]TAPUR POST TUMMINIKAYH TALL K RANEI3ENNUR DISTRiCT HAVERI SRI B BORAJAFI FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT BAN GALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BAN GALORE (BY SHRI P,H,GOThHINDI, HCGP. FOR Ri. SHRI FIARSHA DESAL ADV. P2 & P3. R4 TO R6 SERVED,) RESPONDENTS THIS W,P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF’ THE CONSTITDTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT AS TI-IE CASE MAY BE TO T.HE R.i. 2 AND 3: NOT TO OPERATE THE SELECT LIST AND ALSO THE WAITING LIST AND ISSUE ORDERS OF APPOINTMENT, TILL D.1SPOSA.L OF THE WRIT PETITION ETC. ThIS WPJT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY III AGING IN B C1rIO P Triu, DA iliL COURi MADE IRE FOLLOWING: ORDER In the instant ease, the petit.ioner has sought for a. mandamus directing the respondert Nos. 1 to 3 n,ot 3 operate the select list and also the waiting list and Issue orders of appointment, till the disposal of the writ petition and redo the select list strictly according to the rules framed under the Government’s directive and In accordance with the guidelines of ICAR accepted by the officers committee and to consider the case of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor in Farm Forestry as he possesses the requisite qualifications.
I have perused the grounds urged In the petition In the instant case.
Operative part
3. Since the matter has been listed on 14/2/2006, till date, none appeared for the petitioner. It appears. due to efflux of time, the prayer sought may not survive for consideration and he might have got the benefits. Therefore, writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the respondents, by redressing his grievance. In the event any representation is submitted by the petitioner, the same may I, tflTMQDUBPI030BUTJOpasodsippirnpa.iapTsuooaq JCTSflOJ3waclxa -‘Pg sq9/qw
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.