Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Partly allowed
the appeal is partly allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. THE BRANC H MANAGER, UNITED ID..IA INSURANCE CO. LTD BRANCH OFFICE:, MOETLI BUILDING, OPP KSRTC BUS STAND, HAVERL581 I .. 0 REP. BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER, MiLl) JDIiLRLE ( L10 J FLOOR EM’A\ CMiLE\ KESHWAPUR, HUBL1, RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: RAMANAGOUDA B PATIL ADVOCATE FOR Ri.…
Judgment
SRI, N. M. HULEGEMMANAVAR AGE: MAJOR, 0CC: BUSINESS & OWNER OF THE TRACTOR NO 2/T1043, R/O KANAKA SADAN, NANDIGERI ONI, KURUBGERI, RANESENNUR, DIST. HAVERI
Operative part
THE BRANC H MANAGER, UNITED ID..IA INSURANCE CO. LTD BRANCH OFFICE:, MOETLI BUILDING, OPP KSRTC BUS STAND, HAVERL581 I .. 0 REP. BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER, MiLl) JDIiLRLE ( L10 J FLOOR EM’A\ CMiLE\ KESHWAPUR, HUBL1, RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: RAMANAGOUDA B PATIL ADVOCATE FOR Ri. SHRI MGGADAGOLI. ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OP AGMNST THE 1988 MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. 180920I0 AWARD JUDGEMENT PASSED IN MVCNO8/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE I SENIOR CIVIL JLDGE AND CJM DD1TIONL DHARWAD PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND ETC. DATED AND THIS MFA. COMING H N \GMOHM\ DAS ON FOR ORDERS THIS DELI’ tJ?ED mbz POLLOWI NO: JUDGMENT in this appeaL the apueliant has called in question the judgernent ar.d awa.rd. dated i8092010 in S os asca x Dharwad insofar relates inadeLuac corn nensanon. S w 0 n D C • D C o ‘ - ‘ m B D C r S & t B ‘ 8 B a f D C _ D C D C : a Q D C D C D C ‘ “ D C * q o Q ’ 0 N a a 0 a D C - ’ a a D C D C a a D C Q G D C n S D C 0 g a a D C D C D C D C • D C a a 0 1 * o o ’ a D C D C 4 committed a mistake in only awarding a sum of Rs. l5.000 under the head pain and suffering and the same is required to be enhanced to Rs30,000/ Further, the head loss of amenities and enjoyment in life’, the Tribunal awarded only a sum of Rs. l5.0O0/- and the same is to be enhanced to Rs.30,000/-. In all, the appellant is entitled for an additional compensation of Rs.30.000/. To this extent, the impugned award requires modification, Accordingly. the appeal is partly allowed. The impugned judgemene and award dated 18.09,2010 in MVC,No.8 2008 is hereby modified enhancing the total compensation from Rs,3.55,000 to Rs. 3,85,000fr. cl J 3UDGE sdJ •11 ij\ae—’
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the appeal is partly allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.