No. 1594 of 2003 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Appeal is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
RFA FILED U/S.96 R 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23. 10.2003 PASSED IN ().S.NO.1 14/1997 ON THE FILE OF ThE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.i & JMFC.. HOSPET. DECREEING THE SUIT OF THE APPELLANT HEREIN FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION IN RESPECT OF THE SUIT ITEM NO.13 ONLY AND DISMISSING THE SUIT iN RESPECT OF SUIT ITEMS I TO 12. THIS RFA COMING ON FOR FINAL. HEARING THIS DA\, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Advocate for the appellant is absent. Appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/a Vmb.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.