Hanumappa v. The State of Karnataka
Case Details
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Precedent status
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
Original judgment text
under Section 451 IPC is confirmed.
12. Heard regardihg sentence. It is seen that the appellant was ird custody for about 20 days. Having I regard to the nature of the offence and resultant effect, I am of the considered opinion that the period already
14.: undergone by the appellant vith imposition of fine would meet the ends of justice. Hence, the following order is passed.
1. The appeai is hereby allowed in part.
2. Order of conviction Tor the offences undçr ection 376 r/w. Section 511 IPC is set a$ide and he is acquitted of the said Qffcnce and in its place, the I accused is convicted lbr the offence under SecI ion 354 1PC nw. Section 511 lPC
3. The order of conviction for the offence under: Section 45! IPC is hereby confirmed. :
4. For the. offences under Sections 451 and. 354 !r/w! Section 511 IPC, accused is sentenced undergo simple inipnisonment the period already undergone and to pay a fine of Rs.5.UVO/•. In clefnult of payment of fine. ‘in £ ‘ccl t undergo simflt •r : N • n a ;w rind of 1) mont uS.
5. The cz.t in •nvn at ‘ ni I tie shall be paid to PW.lO b ‘a’ i’f npensation
6. The dec LJs( d i it’ €‘n’ d 8 weeks time to deposit ‘1i’ mis’ .nnsint from today. failizw w hi’ Ii tiP j t ourt is directed to ex’’ we ‘1 cU I ,rli ‘ntenee. Sd! IUDGY Rsh,’nvj