05.2011 Rohit Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 05 May 2011
- Bench
- ALOK SINGH
Outcome
Allowed
case, petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 324, 326, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. J.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana.
Operative part
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in private complaint No.149 of 2009 dated 12.1.2009 under Sections 323/324/326/506/34 IPC, before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Karnal. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in compliance of order dated 8.4.2011, petitioners had appeared before the trial Court and have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court. He has further stated that petitioners shall keep on appearing before the trial Court as and when required. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 8.4.2011 is made absolute. May 05, 2011 R.S. (Alok Singh) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: case, petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 324, 326, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 May 2011. The bench was ALOK SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.