(BY SRI. ZAMEER PASHA, ADVOCATE) v. List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
(BY SRI. ZAMEER PASHA, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND:
DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 3RD WING, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560001 RETURNING OFFICER, JARAGANHALLI HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
SPECIAL OFFICER, JARAGANHALLI HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, BANGALORE-560078 REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959. N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:45917 WP No. 33069 of 2025 HC-KAR
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ALI ASKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560052
JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 3RD WING, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560001
DIRECTOR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BANGALORE-560001 VOTERS LIST VERIFICATION OFFICER, JARAGANHALLI HOUSE BUILDING, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
THE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE, ELECTION COMMISSION, 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUS STOP, SHANTHI NAGAR, BANAGALORE-560027 (BY SRI. YOGESH .D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1, 3, 4, 5 SRI. A. DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R6) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND OTHER RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD.
27.10.2025 VIDE ANNX-F, G, H, K AND L AND ANNEXURE-J DATED
28.10.2025 AND DIRECT THEM TO CHANGE THE PLACE OF ELECTION AS SUGGESTED IN THE ANNEXURE-F, G, H, J, K AND L. AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:45917 WP No. 33069 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is placed on record.
Operative part
3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.