✦ Karnataka High Court

ROAD v. NIL

Company Application No. 397 of 2023ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Insofar as the remuneration payable, the official liquidator, after consideration of the nature of work involved would place a proposal keeping in mind the settled guidelines towards payment of professional fee to the Chartered Accountant. On such proposal for fee being placed after the…

Judgment

M/S KARNATAKA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., (IN LIQN). REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE BHAVAN, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, NO.26-27, M G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. (BY SRI K S MAHADEVAN, ADVOCATE FOR OL) …APPLICANT AND: NIL …RESPONDENT THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 462(5) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES 11(b) AND 298 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN AUDITOR TO AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDING 30.09.2023 AND FIX HIS REMUNERATION; AND ETC. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:1387 CA No. 397 of 2023 IN COP No. 178 of 2004 The application is listed for appointment of an auditor as ORDER required under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956.

2.

M/s Guru & Jana, #41, Patalamma Temple Street, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru - 560 004, whose name finds in the list furnished to the Court by the Official Liquidator is appointed as the auditor to audit the accounts of the Official Liquidator as prayed in the application. The auditor is required to furnish the report within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

3.

Insofar as the remuneration payable, the official liquidator, after consideration of the nature of work involved would place a proposal keeping in mind the settled guidelines towards payment of professional fee to the Chartered Accountant. On such proposal for fee being placed after the report is submitted, the Court would proceed to pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, C.A.397/2023 is disposed of. BRN/ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 28 Sd/- JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Company Application No. 397 of 2023). ← Search more judgments