✦ Karnataka High Court

G.M.SIDDAPPA v. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

WP No. 30359 of 2025R DEVDAS, EQUITY

Case at a glance

Bench
R DEVDAS, EQUITY
Neutral citation
2026:KHC:10597

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.30359 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: G.M.SIDDAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT BYRANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK -583 130 KOLAR DISTRICT (BY SRI. ONKARA K.B., ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT DISTRICT COMMISSIONER OFFICE KOLAR-563 101.

2.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION KOLAR-563 101.

3.

THE TAHSILDAR MALUR TALUK Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONER - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:10597 WP No. 30359 of 2025 HC-KAR MALUR-563 130. KOLAR DISTRICT.

4.

SAMPANNA B K S/O LATE KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT BYRANAHALLI VILLLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK 563 130, KOLAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21-07-2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN RAP.NO.50/2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AS ILLEGAL, VOID AND IN-OPERATIVE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:10597 WP No. 30359 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents No.1 to 3. Notice to respondents No.4 is not necessary for the following reasons:

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that having regard to the amendment brought to Section 136(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, w.e.f., 10.01.2025, the petitioner will have to approach the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal questioning the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act.

3. Upholding the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:10597 WP No. 30359 of 2025 HC-KAR

5.

Office is hereby directed to return the original/certified copies to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 30359 of 2025). ← Search more judgments