(BY SRI. MAHADESHWARAN C N., ADVOCATE) v. (BY SRI.V.SESHU., HCGP)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 ss. 127, 128
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned endorsement at Annexure-A dated 07.08.2025, issued by the respondent Tahsildar Nanjangud Taluk, is hereby quashed and set aside. The respondent-Tahsildar is hereby directed to proceed to enter the names of the…
Judgment
SMT. PAPAMMA D/O CHELUVAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT GANGADA HOSAHALLI, KYATANAHALLI POST, H.D.KOTE, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 026.
2. SRI. VARADARAJAN. M AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT C/O 1038/A, 2ND FLOOR, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST H, 4TH BLOCK, BEHIND BHEEMA JEWELS, HBR EXTENSION, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE - 560 043.
3. SMT. LEELAVATHI W/O LATE JAGADEESH. M, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT HEMAVATHI COLONY, BASARALU VILLAGE, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 416.
4. SMT. SUSHEELA D/O CHELUVAMMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:14181 WP No. 4770 of 2026 HC-KAR
5. SRI. SAGAR S/O LATE RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS,
6. SRI. RAJENDRA. M S/O LATE CHELUVAMMA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R4 TO R6 ARE R/AT NO.3955, ANNAMMA TEMPLE, 2ND CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, MYSORE 570 007.
7. SMT. MOHANKUMARI JAVARAN W/O JAVARAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.311, MATTUR, POCHAMPALLI TALUK, TIRUPATTUR MAIN ROAD, KRISHNAGIRI, TAMIL NADU - 635 203.
8. SMT. VANAJAKSHI. M W/O KUMARSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.4226, 6TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, MYSORE - 570 007. (BY SRI. MAHADESHWARAN C N., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE.
DISTRICT COMMISSIONER - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:14181 WP No. 4770 of 2026 HC-KAR MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE - 570 011.
TAHASILDAR, NANJANGUD TALUK OFFICE, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 301. (BY SRI.V.SESHU., HCGP) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DTD 07.08.2025 ISSUED BY THE R-3 (ANNX-A) AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EFFECT KHATA/RECORD ENTRIES IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS, STRICTLY IN TERMS OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 17.12.2019 PASSED IN O.S NO. 457/2013 AT ANNX-F AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at Annexure-F is the judgment and decree passed by the - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:14181 WP No. 4770 of 2026 HC-KAR learned II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Nanjanagud in O.S.No.457/2013, where the defendants are the Chief Secretary, State of Karnataka, the District Commissioner, Mysore District and the Tahsildar, Nanjangud Taluk, against whom a relief of declaration of title and permanent injunction was sought. A judgment and decree were passed on 17.12.2019 declaring that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the suit schedule property, but in respect of the relief of directing the 3rd defendant- Tahsildar, to enter the names of the plaintiffs in the revenue records, the trial Court held that it has no jurisdiction to direct the Tahsildar. Learned counsel submits that despite such a judgment and decree passed by a competent Civil Court, the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar has issued the impugned endorsement at Annexure-A dated 07.08.2025, declining to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records on the ground that the lands in question are 'sendi vana' and it is not granted to any person. - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:14181 WP No. 4770 of 2026 HC-KAR
3. Having regard to the judgment and decree passed by the competent Civil Court against the State and its authorities and the said judgment and decree not being challenged by the state and its authorities, the Tahsildar is duty bound to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, having regard to the provisions contained in Sections 127 & 128 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act,
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned endorsement at Annexure-A dated 07.08.2025, issued by the respondent Tahsildar Nanjangud Taluk, is hereby quashed and set aside. The respondent-Tahsildar is hereby directed to proceed to enter the names of the plaintiffs in O.S.No.457/2013, in the revenue records as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC:14181 WP No. 4770 of 2026 HC-KAR Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE CT: JL
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.