MRS. ASHA G.L v. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having regard to the fact that a person aggrieved of any action sought to be taken by the Bank under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:200 WP No. 31106 of 2024 Enforcement of Security…
Judgment
MRS. ASHA G.L., W/O MR. LAKSMINARAYANA GUBBA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO. 222, MATHA NILAYA, 5TH MAIN ROAD, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU 560 085 (BY SRI. S. BALARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, STRESSED ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, 11/90, III FLOOR, NEAR OLD SHIVAJI THEATRE, J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 002, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. (BY SRI. NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 18.09.2024 AT ANNEXURE -B DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:200 WP No. 31106 of 2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT SO PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER By order dated 21.11.2024, this Court had directed the respondent-Bank not to take any precipitiative action, if the petitioner were to deposit 10% of the outstanding amount within four weeks from the date of the order and the petitioner has not complied with the directions.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready with a cheque of her brother for a sum of Rs.10 Lakhs. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the outstanding amount is about Rs.3.5 Crores. Therefore, the directions issued by this Court have not been complied with.
Operative part
Having regard to the fact that a person aggrieved of any action sought to be taken by the Bank under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:200 WP No. 31106 of 2024 Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'SARFAESI Act') can challenge the same before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and directions have been issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the High Court should not entertain such writ petitions and the fact that there is non- compliance of the orders passed by this Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that no relief can be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 CT:SNN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.