Gandhinagar, Secunderabad v. Vice President
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Between: 1 K. Sanjay Kumar S/o K.Indrasena 33 years, R/o Flat No. G2 Rajashri Apartments, Megacity House No. 950 Ameerpet, Hyderabad 2 M/s. Soumith Enterprises, D. No. 6-6-269/131 Arun Jyothi Colony, Gandhinagar, Secunderabad rep by Proprietor, K. Sanjay Kumar ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Union of India rep by Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, Secretary, Finance, Udgoy Bhavan, New Delhi 2 ING Vysya Bank Ltd., rep by its Authorised Officer, Vice President, Sardar Patel Road Branch Secunderabad-500 003 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially a Writ of Mandamus declaring the provisions of the Securitisation & reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, especially Section 13(2) of the Said Act as being ultravires and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the notices issued by the second respondent NO.1 u/s 13(2) of the said Act bearing Ref. No. 1021/2003 dated 8-4- 2003. For the Petitioners: MR.R.V.SUBBA RAO For the Respondent No. 1: MR. A. RAJASEKHAR REDDY SC FOR CG. For the Respondent No. 2: MR. ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA The court made the following
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Jun 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.