✦ Karnataka High Court

G. NAGESH SHEREGAR v. SUBRAHMANYA SAKLATHI

RSA No. 1986 of 2023RAVI V HOSMANI2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1212. SHEKHAR POOJARY S/O NARAYANA POOJARY R/O SATHNAKERI, NEAR RAMA MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST 576216 KUNDAPURA TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.06.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.4/2022 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE…

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1986 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:

2. G. NAGESH SHEREGAR SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT SAROJA N SHERUGAR W/O LATE G NAGESH SHERUGAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

3. KUM VINAYA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

4. VIDYA SHERUGAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

5. SRI GANESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

6. VEENA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

7. KARTHIK PRASAD AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS APPELLANTS NO.2 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE G. NAGESH SHEREGAR, R/A SANTHAYYANAKERI, NEAR RAM MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST 576 216, KUNDAPURA TALUK. (BY SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) …APPELLANTS Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023 HC-KAR AND:

1.

SUBRAHMANYA SAKLATHI AGED 48 YEARS,

2.

SRIDHAR SAKLATHI AGED 52 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 Are CHILDREN OF NARAYANA DRIVER

3.

NARAYANA DRIVER AGED 60 YEARS, PARENTS NOT KNOWN APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR SINCE DEAD,

4.

SMT SANJEEVI SHEREGAR AGED 70 YEARS, W/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR,

5.

SUBRAHMANYA SHEREGAR AGED 38 YEARS, S/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR

6.

SANTHOSH SHEREGAR AGED 35 YEARS, S/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR

7.

SMT PREMA SHEREGAR AGED 34 YEARS, D/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR

8.

SMT BABAY SHEREGAR AGED 32 YEARS, D/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR R/A NERAMBALLI KONI VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DIST. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023 HC-KAR

9.

SMT. RESHMA @ SHASHIKALA AGED 39 YEARS, W/O LATE GANGADHARA

10.

RAGHAVENDRA SHEREGAR AGED 30 YEARS, S/O LATE GANGADHARA

11.

GIRISH SHEREGAR AGED 19 YEARS, S/O LATE GANGADHARA RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 8, 10 TO 12 ARE R/A SANTHAYYANAKERI, NEAR RAMA MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST - 576 216 KUNDAPURA.

12.

SHEKHAR POOJARY S/O NARAYANA POOJARY R/O SATHNAKERI, NEAR RAMA MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST 576216 KUNDAPURA TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.06.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.4/2022 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.11.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.260/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RSA No. 1986 of 2023). ← Search more judgments