MR. MUSTAFA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, Revision Petition is dismissed as having
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Hence, Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 430 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. MUSTAFA S/O AHAMED JAN AGED 32 YEARS, NOW AT R/A 3984, 10TH CROSS KODI CAMP, TARIKERE CHIKKMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ALSO AT 9TH CROSS, KODI CAMP, TARIKERE - 577 228. (BY SRI. H. MALATESH, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 101.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKMAGALURU - 577 101.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN - 577 201. (BY SMT. ANITHA N. GIRISH, HCGP) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:39892 CRL.RP No. 430 of 2023 HC-KAR THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER BEARING NO.J1/M.A.G./(EXTERNMENT)242/2022-23, PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT D.C. AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DATED 28.03.2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDE R WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 28.03.2023 passed by respondent no.1, this Revision Petition is filed.
2. Sri H.Malatesh, learned counsel for petitioner submitted under impugned order District Magistrate, Chikmagaluru-respondent no.1 passed an order of 'externment' of petitioner from Chikmagaluru district to Hassan District for a period a period of one year from 28.03.2023 to 27.03.2024.
3. It was submitted that on said order this Court had granted an interim order of stay and during pendency of this petition, said period has lapsed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:39892 CRL.RP No. 430 of 2023 HC-KAR
In view of above, learned counsel for petitioner submitted order impugned having been spent, Revision Petition has become infructuous.
Submission is not opposed.
Operative part
Hence, Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, Revision Petition is dismissed as having
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.