BANGALORE - 560 078. (BY SRI. AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE) v. SRI. G.S. VENKAT SUBHA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, petition is disposed off
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. However once the order under Section 248(3) of the Act attains finality, needless to state respondent - BBMP to take steps to ensure that the order passed is taken to its logical end. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE…
Judgment
SRI. MOHAMMAD AZIMULLA BAIG, SON OF MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN BAIG, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, NO.20, THIRD FLOOR, FIRST CROSS, JHBCS LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 078. (BY SRI. AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND:
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BBMP, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002. Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BBMP, BEGURU SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 114.
SMT. RESHMA R, WIFE OF DILIP G, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.706, KALENA AGRAHARA, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 076. (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. G.S. VENKAT SUBHA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16784 WP No. 27782 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.10.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider representation at Annexure-A dated 14.10.2024.
2. Petitioner has made a representation alleging that the private respondent has put up construction without adhering to the requirements in the setback area in terms of the BBMP bye-laws and regulations.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the private respondent that as against the order passed under Section 248(3) of the BBMP Act, 2020 (for short 'The Act'), they have filed an appeal before the Chief Commissioner in - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16784 WP No. 27782 of 2024 Appeal No.306/2024. In light of the same further adjudication is not called.
Operative part
However once the order under Section 248(3) of the Act attains finality, needless to state respondent - BBMP to take steps to ensure that the order passed is taken to its logical end. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, petition is disposed off
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.