SRI. SREENU YATAM v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 s. 313
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 21583 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SRI. SREENU YATAM S/O ANJIREDDY YATAM AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
SMT. ANITHA KONDAREDDY W/O SREENU YATAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.3700, LILLICK DR, APT 125 SANTA CLARA, CA, USA, 95051 VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER SRI. ANIL KUMAR KONDI REDDY S/O VENKA REDDY KONDIREDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT NO.16-21, SARVABOTLA VAARI STREET, KA NELLORE, ANDRA PRADESH - 524 201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE N.R.SQUARE, BANGALURU - 560 002 - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:11587 WP No. 21583 of 2025 HC-KAR
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MARUTHI SEVA NAGAR SUB-DIVISION, R.S. PALYA, KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BBMP, BANGALORE - 560 084. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SINCHANA M.R, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE AND QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 01/07/2025 BEARING NO SAKAANIA/MAASENA/VA-59/85/P.R./11/2025-26 PASSED NOTICE UNDER SECTION 313 OF THE BBMP ACT 2020 BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2 ANNEXURE D TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash Notice No: SaKaaNiA/MaaSeNa/Va-59/85/P.R./11/2025-26 passed notice under section 313 of the BBMP Act 2020 by the respondent No 2 Annexure D to the writ petition, 01/07/2025 bearing b) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature and direct the respondents to consider the plan submitted by the petitioner at Annexure C to the writ petition and accord sanction to the same and, c) Grant any other remedy that this Hon'ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:11587 WP No. 21583 of 2025 HC-KAR
2. The grievance of the petitioners that without considering the plan which has been submitted by the petitioners, a notice dated 1.07.2025 at Annexure-D has been issued. A perusal of Annexure-D indicates that it is a notice issued under Section 313 of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 (BBMP Act, 2020) calling upon the petitioners to furnish the documents called upon in the said notice. It is for the respondents to reply to the same and furnish the documents for the purpose of consideration by the respondents. Instead of doing so, the petitioners have approached this Court challenging the said notice under Section 313 of the BBMP Act, 2020.
Hence, reserving liberty to the petitioners to reply to the said notice, which reply shall be submitted on or before
06.03.2026 and directing the respondents to consider the same in accordance with law, the petition stands disposed of. GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43 SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.