M/s.Aditya Construction Company v. Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Indian Partnership Act, 1932
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 25172/2011(GM-RES) BETWEEN : M/s.Aditya Construction Company A partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 having its Head Office at H.No.31 Karapur Tisk, Sanquelim Goa-403 505 And having its Branch Office at Plot No.2553, Sector No.12 Malmaruti Extension Belgaum-16 Rep.by its Partner B.S.Purandara .. PETITIONER (By Sri G.Vikram, Adv.,) AND :
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited (Govt. of Karnataka Enterprise) having its Regd. Office at 4th Floor, Coffee Board Building No.1, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-1 Rep.by its Managing Director - 2 -
The Chief Engineer Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited Upper Tunga Project Zone Shimoga
The Executive Engineer Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited Upper Tunga Project Zone Ranebennur .. RESPONDENTS (By Sri M.R.C.Ravi, Adv.,) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the letter dated
2.5.2011 by R3 at Annexure-D and for direction to the respondents not to deduct any amount from the bills of the petitioner in pursuance of the Annexure-D and issue any other writ, etc. This writ petition coming on for orders, this day the Court made the following:-
Operative part
O R D E R The impugned order at Annexure-D is said to have been withdrawn by respondent No.2. Hence, the grievance of the petitioner no more survives. - 3 - Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. JUDGE Sd/- *ck/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Partnership Act, 1932; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.