Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE flHARWAD BEFCETH 10K DALA IN H CO 0 R JRCUfl BENt AT L.’IARWAD iJa’eU trs ‘e 12’ d8b r Jui•e 2’. !2 N THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR AND SRI N S KULKARNI. MEMBER I— 0 4 L ‘K da’at’%c ° .2 i12 BTCttt’ Bh’r as .a a Ia 4 3 O N R’o Ne’3ga ti. a T Gtkak O.c P !ç,i ‘S:’ N •a. C ‘ a ‘iC A . :; t:1.• —r•u. v.1 r ‘
s’,. .- .21 • r — %j, p i.ii. , Il—I F — I, . I— t I b•s r.i F A ‘sfi’i u• g4; nr 1.1 ‘ 4.t 15 aya ‘.t flu ;‘ 1’ i dated c 2 - C. :.asd ir M r Nt. 1F.’1 J•.M c• t.w ‘i’e .St fl 4’.l 14c rfl,’ ‘g4’ ‘‘:: t4i — Ii Ala’ —‘ E4I3atr ‘is’ \ ..r
•.i a.ttef.._. q.” - CNCIL N 3 ‘I, passed
5.1 ‘2( .“x%jt- ‘°r D: .1 lAmb- Al o 4er d3 ef fri.. Ii Al Be!claur 1 2 The ‘ea ned cc’inse’ fcr t ipce’;-irt “: in-’ a i’-J tot ei ‘Oi ECDOflJflt ;y; ‘21”., ce;t •1 Ci 3Ck,V Ti • ,‘ 1C i d 1 / KL I — r • •• _ • •.: •... • 2’. ) C + - H 3 : U 3 t _ U v ) U ) U p x - P : p - + 1 ) 3 - 1 : D - ‘ ? 4 p U U 1 L I U 3 . ) U — • 1 — C I 3- 3 - ‘ D C D P 4 - - t : ) U D — C a aI ) 1 l i r C — P ) C U - ( t V D C 3 : 3 33 : U U ) ? j ( )a I ( ) U ) ) U DU C t - U ” 1 ) U L ) i L U ) j J - D C ) U La( ) I I C a ) U D C a( p 0 - — ) : 1 3 - ) L 3 : D C ) U • + 3 . C 3 (
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.