SRI CHANDRASHEKAR P v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M G S KAMAL
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:31151
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In that view of the matter, writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available under law. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:31151 WP No. 23893 of 2021
Judgment
SRI CHANDRASHEKAR P S/O SRI P GOPAL AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT 81, 2ND CROSS 2ND MAIN, PRAKASH NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 021 (BY SRI. SANDHYA U PRABHU.,ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK, RAJAJINAGAR, 2ND BLOCK BRANCH, NO.615, PADMA COMPLEX DR RAJKUMAR ROAD RAJAJINAGAR 2ND BLOCK BENGALURU - 560 021. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. HARIDAS BHAT.,ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED 39TH ACMM BANGALORE DATED.08.12.2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E …RESPONDENT THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:31151 WP No. 23893 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the month for some time submits that since order impugned in this petition is passed by the 39th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, petitioner would file appeal against the said order as provided under the Act. However, the petitioner seeks extension of interim order granted by this Court by order dated 23.12.2021.
Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the condition imposed by this Court for depositing 30% of the amount due has already been complied with and the same has not been disputed by the counsel for the respondent-Bank.
In that view of the matter, writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available under law. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:31151 WP No. 23893 of 2021
Interim protection granted by this Court is extended for a further period of eight weeks. The time consumed in prosecuting this matter be exempted for the purpose of consideration of the issue of limitation, if in the event of petitioner filing the appeal within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.