✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 15 Jun 2010

S.A No. 217 of 2009 · Andhra Pradesh High Court

S.A No. 217 of 2009GHULAM MOHAMMED, G CHANDRAIAH2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
15 Jun 2010
Bench
GHULAM MOHAMMED, G CHANDRAIAH

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. From a reading of the above provision it is clear that application filed under sub-section (1) has to be disposed of within a time frame of sixty days and the proviso to sub section 5, envisages that the time can be extended for the…
  • Para 77. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, we direct the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad to dispose of the S.A.No.217 of 2009, in accordance with law, by considering all the issues, including that of maintainability, as expeditiously as possible…

Judgment

. . (2). . (3). . (4). . (5) Any application made under sub-section (1) shall be dealt with by the Debts Recovery Tribunal as expeditiously as possible and disposed of within sixty days from the date of such application: Provided that the Debts Recovery Tribunal may, from time to time, extend the said period for reasons to be recorded in writing, so, however, that the total period of pendency of the application with the Debts Recovery Tribunal, shall not exceed four months from the date of making of such application made under sub-section (1). (6). . (7). .

5.

From a reading of the above provision it is clear that application filed under sub-section (1) has to be disposed of within a time frame of sixty days and the proviso to sub section 5, envisages that the time can be extended for the reasons to be recorded by the Tribunal in writing and however, the total period of pendency, shall not exceed four months from the date of making such an application under sub-section (1) of the Section 17.

6.

The above statutory obligation has to be discharged by the functionaries within the time frame prescribed by the statue and in the present case, though the application is filed in the year 2009, the same is kept pending since long time.

7.

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, we direct the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad to dispose of the S.A.No.217 of 2009, in accordance with law, by considering all the issues, including that of maintainability, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. -------------------------------------- GHULAM MOHAMMED,J -------------------------------------- G.CHANDRAIAH,J DATE:15.06.2010 AVS

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 15 Jun 2010. The bench was GHULAM MOHAMMED, G CHANDRAIAH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.A No. 217 of 2009). ← Search more judgments