MANJUNATH S v. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATIVE)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 20802 OF 2023 (GM-RES-PIL) BETWEEN:
MANJUNATH S., SON OF SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDENT OF No.175 BOMMENAHALLI, HOSABADAVANE BOMMENAHALLI, BARANDUR SHIVAMOGGA, BHADRAVATI KARNATAKA – 577 245.
MANTESHA K.N., SON OF NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDENT AT No.10 KAREHALLI, BARANDUR SHIMOGA, BHADRAVATI KARNATAKA – 577 245.
KANTHARAJU A., SON OF ANNAYYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDENT AT BEHIND SCHOOL KAREHALLI, KAREHALLI, BARANDUR, BHADRAVATI, SHIMOGA KARNATAKA – 577 245. MARIMUTHU Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:32409-DB WP No. 20802 of 2023
MANOHARA R.E., SON OF ERE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS RESIDENT AT No.142 BEHIND SCHOOL KAREHALLI KAREHALLI, BARANDUR BHADRAVATI, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245.
SANDEEPA D., AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS SON OF DHANAPAL RESIDENT OF KAREHALLI, BARANDUR, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245.
MAHESHA S., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SON OF SHIVAMURTHI RESIDENT OF KAREHALLI, BARANDUR, BHADRAVATI, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245. (BY SRI VACHAN G.A, ADVOCATE) AND:
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATIVE) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER BHADRAVATHI, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245. THE PRESIDENT DR. B.R. AMBEKDAR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION (R) KAREHALLI, BHADRAVATI, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245.
4. THE SECRETARY DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR EDUCATIONAL …PETITIONERS - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:32409-DB WP No. 20802 of 2023 INSTITUTION (R) KAREHALLI, BHADRAVATI, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245.
5. THE HEAD MASTER DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION (R) KAREHALLI, BHADRAVATI, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA – 577 245. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-1 AND R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08/05/2023 OF THE PETITIONER TO HOLD AN ENQUIRY BEFORE RENEWAL OF THE SCHOOL LICENSE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. G.A. Vachan for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition stating that the petitioner would opt to pursue the representation already made to the competent - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:32409-DB WP No. 20802 of 2023 authority-respondent in relation to the grievance raised in this petition about the counseling of the school and infrastructure available in the school.
2. Reserving such liberty, the petition is not entertained. If the representation is not made, it will be open for the petitioners to make a fresh representation. The authority shall consider the pending representation or the fresh representation as the case may be, submitted by the petitioner and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.