Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:1) (cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:7)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) It is observed that any further development which may be adverse to the petitioner shall give fresh cause of action to him. Sd/- (N.…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 14154 OF 2024 (GM – MM S) BETWEEN: M/S LAKSHMI STONE CRUSHING INDUSTRIES REP BY SRI. M. T. KRISHNEGOWDA MANAGING PARTNER AGED 59 YEARS RESIDENT OF DODDAMAGGE VILLAGE ARKALGUD TALUK, DODDAMAGGE HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 142 (BY Mr. RAJESH BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR Mr. RAVINDRA GAJANAN KOLLE, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND: SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
#1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001
#2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVT AND REVISING AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
#3. THE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD - 2 - (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:1) (cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:7)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) BENGALURU - 560 001.
#4. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY GRAMA PANCHAYATH ROAD BEHIND R T O OFFICE SATHYAMANGALA HASSAN - 573 201.
#5. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN - 573 201.
#6. THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST SAKLESHPURA SUB-DIVISION SAKLESHPURA.
#7. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER ARKALGUDU DIVISION, ARAKALGUDU - 562 101.
#8. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER AND LICENSING AUTHORITY DISTRICT STONE CRUSHING UNIT LICENSING AND REGULATION AUTHORITY, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN. (BY SRI. S S MAHENDRA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS FILED PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE NOTICE BEARING No.GaBhuE/HiBhuHa/Deemed Aranya/ KaGaGu Sha/2023-24/4150 DATED 15.02.2024 PASSED BY 4TH RESPONDENT SENIOR GEOLOGIST PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: (cid:1) - 3 - (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:1) (cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:7)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) CORAM: HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. Rajesh Bhat for learned advocate Mr. Ravindra Gajanan Kolle for the petitioner tenders the memo dated 24.07.2024, which reads as under, “In view of a Letter dated 18.07.2024 bearing No. GaBhuE/HiBhuHa/Deemed Forest/KaGaGu.Shakhe /2024-25/1921-37 issued by the 4th Respondent Senior Geologist permitting this Petitioner to continue the Quarry & Stone Crusher activities pursuant to the decision of the District Task Force (Mines) Committee meeting held on 26.06.2024 and another Letter dated 18.07.2024 bearing No. GaBhuE/HiBhuHa/KaGaGu.Shakhe/2024-25/1918 written to the 3rd Respondent Director requesting to issue Mineral Dispatch Permits through ILMS; this Petitioner seeks to withdraw the above Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh, if need be, to meet the ends of justice. (copy of both Letters dated 18.07.2024 are enclosed).”
#2. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:1) (cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:7)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) It is observed that any further development which may be adverse to the petitioner shall give fresh cause of action to him. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.