MRS. MAHESHWARI M v. PREMA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
MRS. MAHESHWARI M. AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS W/O LATE MR. D. MADANAKANTHAN R/O. No. 863, 7TH MAIN 3RD CROSS, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU-560 008 (BY SRI. RAJESH GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT ROOM No.222, 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001
THE DGP AND IGP KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS No.2, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE No.1, INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:28136-DB WPHC No. 71 of 2025 HC-KAR
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE EAST DIVISION (L AND O) SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 051
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE HALASURU SUB DIVISION HALASURU BENGALURU-560 008
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE INDIRANAGAR POLICE STATION INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU-560 038 (BY SRI. P. THEJESH, HCGP) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP(HC) IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE PETITIONER, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO (a) ISSUE A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS TO PRODUCE THE MISSING PERSON BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:28136-DB WPHC No. 71 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain erroneous statements have been made in the writ petition by oversight.
Operative part
2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with proper pleadings and materials on record. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE RAK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.