THE KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL v. INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for non-
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ COMPANY PETITION NO. 256 OF 2012 BETWEEN: THE KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, 'KHANIJA BHAVAN', 4TH FLOOR EAST WING, NO.49, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (L) MR. B. RAJENDRA (BY SMT. N. NANDITA DAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASHANTH KUMAR D. ANANDARAMA K., ADVOCATES) …PETITIONER MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND: BELLARY STEELS AND ALLOYS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: S-10/11, ANANTAPUR ROAD, BELLARY-583101 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. S. MADHAV (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:4092 COP No. 256 of 2012 HC-KAR THIS COMPANY PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 433(E) AND (F) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT COMPANY, BELLARY STEEL AND ALLOYS LIMITED, BE WOUND UP UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER
Once again adjournment is sought. Compliance with the order dated 09.01.2026 is also not made.
Operative part
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.