The Claims v. Puttanna
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV & SRI. H. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 8604/2014 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1930/2024) BETWEEN: The Claims, Sriram General Insurance Company Limited, E-8, EPIP-RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapur - Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 022. Shrirama Insurance Company Limited, No.302, 3rd Floor, S and S Corner Building, Plot No.48, Hospital Road, Shivajinagar, Bangalore-560 001. (By Sri. O. Mahesh, Advocate) ...APPELLANT AND 1 . Puttanna, Aged 52 years, S/o. Late Rachaich,
Puttamani, Aged 46 years, W/o. Puttanna,
2 Shashikala, Aged 24 years, D/o. Puttanna, Bhagya, Aged about 22 years, D/o. Puttanna, All are R/o. Telnur Village, Santhemaranahalli Hobli, Chamarajanagara Taluk and District - 571313. Gopalakrishnan, Aged 67 years, S/o. Chikkananjaiah, R/at Ariyappam Palyam, Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu - 600001. Puttaraju, Aged 47 years, S/o. Late Puttaswamy, R/at No.4/7, Opp: Govt. Hospital, Triveni Nagara, T. Narasipura Taluk, Mysore District - 571124. The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, No.305, Atchams Mansion, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Southern Extension, Kollegal - 571 440. ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri. Veerabhadraswamy H.P., Advocate for R1 to R4; Sri. B.C. Seetharama Rao, Advocate for R7; Vide order dated 22.01.2015, notice to R5 and R6 is dispensed with) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.09.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO. 85/2012 ON 3 THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT AT CHAMARAJANAGAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant – Insurance Company has filed a Memo seeking permission to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. Further the Learned Counsel for the Appellant - Insurance Company prays that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may kindly be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. The said Memo is placed on record.
Operative part
2. Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount if any, deposited before this Court shall be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. Draw the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MCR
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.