✦ Karnataka High Court

Veerabhadrappa v. Krishna K.R

S SUNIL DUTT YADAV SRI H PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MCR

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV SRI. H. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, MEMBER & M.F.A.No. 7773/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 2390/2024) BETWEEN: Veerabhadrappa, S/o Late Mahadevapa, Aged about 56 years, R/at Hanchipura Village And Post, Saraguru Hobli, H. D. Kote Taluk, Mysuru District - 571 121. ...APPELLANT (By Sri. Syed Abdul Saboor, Advocate) AND 1 . Krishna K.R., S/o Ramaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/at No.61, Kodaseege Village, H. D. Kote Taluk, Mysuru District - 571 301.

2.

Manager, Future General Insurance Co. Ltd., 2 Office address: 1st Floor, No.10, Raxidi Mansion Temple Road, Jayalakshmipuram, Mysuru - 570 012. ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri. Pradeep B., Advocate for R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.08.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO. 995/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT AT MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE SEEKING CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Only), in 3 addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

3.

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

4.

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

Operative part

5.

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MCR

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments