SRI VENKATESH v. HIGH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions of the parties are left open. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 20479 OF 2025 (KLGP) BETWEEN:
1. SRI VENKATESH S/O LATE BETTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.3, 7TH CROSS, 60 FT. ROAD, J.C.NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURA, BENGALURU (BY SRI. K.N.NITISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WEST ZONE, SAMPIGE ROAD, OPPOSITE MANTRI MALL, BENGALURU-560003. REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT COMMISSIONER (BBMP-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION, QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07/01/2025 PASSED IN LGC(P) NO.1532/2018 BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT AT BENGALURU (CCH-2) ON THE APPLICATION SEEKING DISCHARGE AT ANNEXURE-Z, ETC. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:39604-DB WP No. 20479 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition to prosecute his defence in trial of the case.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions of the parties are left open. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.