SRI. B.K. NAGABHUSHAN v. SRI. P. MANJUNATHA REDDY
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Considering the submissions, the appeal dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A., if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1597 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
SRI. B.K. NAGABHUSHAN, S/O LATE D.KRISHNAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/A KRISHNAPPA REDDY LAYOUT, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 068. SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court Karnataka 1(a) SMT. V. NETHRAVATHI, W/O. LATE B.K. NAGABHUSHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 1(b) SMT. PREMA LEKHA N., D/O. LATE B.K. NAGABHUSHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 1(c) SMT. HARSHITHA N., D/O. LATE B. K. NAGABHUSHANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 1(d) SMT. YOGETHA N., D/O. LATE B. K. NAGABHUSHANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:14786-DB RFA No. 1597 of 2014 HC-KAR 1(e) MR. JAYANTH N., S/O LATE B. K. NAGABHUSHANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT:NO.40, KRISHNAPPA REDDY LAYOUT, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 068. (BY SRI. M.S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE) …APPELLANT AND: SRI. P. MANJUNATHA REDDY, S/O. LATE PAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O NO.25, SAMPOORNA SIRI, ITI LAYOUT, H.S.R LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 068. (BY SRI. H.S. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED: 27.09.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3809/2013 ON THE FILE OF XX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND RESTORE THE SUIT TO ITS FILE FOR FINAL DISPOSAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:14786-DB RFA No. 1597 of 2014 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) It appears that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court and the learned counsel for the appellants have filed memo dated 20.02.2026 which reads as hereunder: "The Appellants herein most respectfully submit that during the pendency of the present Appeal, the dispute between the parties regarding recovery of money involved in this appeal has been settled out of the Court. Hence, the Appellants herein most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of this Appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity. "
Considering the submissions, the appeal dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A., if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 ct-vn
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.