M/S. NHDPL SOUTH PRIVATE LIMITED, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NHDPL PROPERTIES v. UNION BANK OF INDIA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 23993 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. NHDPL SOUTH PRIVATE LIMITED, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NHDPL PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., AND PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.110, LEVEL 1, ANDREWS BUILDING, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, ALSO HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 7, 7TH FLOOR, NITESH TIMES SQUARE, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. K.B. SWAMY. (BY SRI. VAMSHI KRISHNA C, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) …PETITIONER RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
UNION BANK OF INDIA VILE PARLE (W) BRANCH, SHIV SHAKTI, 11 VITHAL NAGAR, COOP, HOUSING SOCIETY, 10TH ROAD, J.V.P.D. SCHEME, VILE PARLE (W) MUMBAI - 400 049, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA NEW CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA - 400 001. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18031 WP No. 23993 of 2021
THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN MUMBAI C/O. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, 4TH FLOOR, RBI BYCULLA OFFICE BUILDING, OPP MUMBAI CENTRAL RAILWAY STATION, BYCULLA, MUMBAI - 400 008. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE 1ST RESPONDENT DIRECTING INVOKE THE BANK GUARANTEES DATED 20.7.2016 AND NO. DATED 20.07.2016 AND TO TRANSFER THE PROCEEDS TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IT TO THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER
1. Despite the order dated 08.01.2024, neither the office objections are complied with nor is there any appearance on part of the petitioner.
Operative part
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the above petition and hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.