INCOME TAX OFFICER v. SARANGI PRATHAMIKA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Following the above decision dated 17.04.2026 in W.A.No.1141/2026, the present appeal also stands dismissed. SD/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE NC CT: RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Case journey
Linked proceedings
Built from judgments in the Courts & Cases corpus and the links detected in their text. Coverage is incomplete — earlier or later proceedings may be missing, so verify against the official record. How Case Journey works
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1509 OF 2026
(T-IT) BETWEEN:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND TPS, MANDYA – 571 401
2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 110 003
3. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. THIRUMALESH. M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SARANGI PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA KR PET, MANDYA - 571 436, REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29919-DB WA No. 1509 of 2026 HC-KAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1956. PAN AARAS6829F REP. BY JAYARAJA, CEO OF THE PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AGED 38 YEARS, S/O NANDAKUMAR, SARANGI VILLAGE, JAGINAKERE POST, K.R. PETE TALUK, MANDYA-571 436 (BY SRI.S.V.RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08/09/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.4092/2025 AND PASS SUCH OTHER
ORDER.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) This appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 questioning the learned Single Judge’s order dated 08.09.2025 in W.P.No.4092/2025. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29919-DB WA No. 1509 of 2026 HC-KAR
Heard learned senior standing counsel Sri.M.Thirumalesh for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Sri.S.V.Ravishankar for respondent.
Learned counsel appearing for both the parties would submit that the issue raised in the present appeal is considered and answered against the appellants/Revenue in W.A.No.1141/2026 dated 17.04.2026.
Following the above decision dated 17.04.2026 in W.A.No.1141/2026, the present appeal also stands dismissed. SD/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE NC CT: RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.