SMT CHINNAMMA (li RAM VrHAL v. CROSS OBJECTOR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HOW BLE MR. JUSTICE N ANANDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL CR08 NO 97 OF 2009 BETWEEN SMT CHINNAMMA (li RAM VrHAL W/0 RANGASWAMY GOUNDER 51 YEARS C/O SIDDANNAVARA THOTA HONNEGOWDANAHALLI ROAD BEEMANABEEDU GRAMA GUNDLUPET TALUK (By SrLR C NAOARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND CROSS OBJECTOR YASIN S/O USMAN SAB 35 YEARS, AflAR ENGINEERING WORKS KUSHATAGI ROAD GADAG DISTRICT DRWER OF THE KSRTC BUS (‘(Mi —I / I • .%“ 1 • 0••.
1.4 .4)’ -2- MFA CROB NO.97/09
#3. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, MYSORE DIVISION MYSORE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL OFFICE KSRTC, BANGALORE RESPONDENTS MFA.CROB in MFA.NO. 303/2009 filed U/O. 41 rule 22 of CPC against the judgement and award DT. 184.2008 passed in MVC.NO. 89/2008 on the file of the DIST, AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal CROB is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: COF s ’ t . C 0
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.