Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BSREENIVASE GOWDA
Judgment
HIBI I BOT R1 LE( F\L SERVl(ES (OMM1TFEF BABJAI.( )RE BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT l\ filL iii(H COLRF OF KAR\ATAKA Al B \\GAI ORE DATED THIS THE j3tF DAY OF PRI1 2012 ( )M IL.\ I OfS PHf SEN1 HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BSREENIVASE GOWDA & SMT PRABHA MURTHY MEMBER Miscellaneous_Firstppea1 No324fOO9 tLnIc 1(1(1/UI v. I (JO’20 12) Between: B 2 \ Ca A I shot j7 t-I 1 [r 2T \ C) Padnaii b1ii-ir SI u 0 Ar d BySr VJ’aua a d $iJr hi isa K TI B 1< Iii !\‘ !-i. l: ppe11a Respondents I 1 THIS k1’I’I’AJ rn%wcc; ifls FOR tnwIuArrh)N BEI’nRF: lOW .UUIAI’ FlES flu: F( H i IJwr%• , ORDER is ‘Ri)EH Tgr). £ 2’i FETNi REF riui r JT)I : CONCILLflON ORIER I. ‘IT If C iI!dI1( pans ii fib us ‘n—tLit. prnrin. 2 Atici piol’a’wecl neizoltitioiis. 11w matter is settled flit Appellant reed t c ye anc i ‘spund I isurar ‘4 It 1 arid on add 1110 at ha’, e v2rdec I. ‘[ribu ir Itill aiid Hfldl %ctlItrnenl c•i :he claim Ajaini Mcno i filed on beha’I (‘1 the pan I.’. to this rllec t. rh -( Ins C cnnpa - ba’ ai ( ) i” po9t 11 r Von a c I ui 1_,. . (4’ f,t • i. I Lie •. .1. ii ill. ii’! I — Lit.-’ ft. —I •-t’t.n 1:1%,:’.’ ..! • ;1!11 C ‘“il ‘—Il di —. . ;...,.- -. j (J ‘1K 1’” 1 1 d I I 1 C C
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.