Judgment · High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF IRNATAKA AT BANGALORE i)ATE1 FillS j1H )AY uf MAY 201 2 r E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BSREENIVASE GOWDA \li’( (1lcW( (l N I jr1 Appral \o 11 4:’ 0 2 )iS (MX BETWEEN S. Xi RA()IIAVFNI1IF\ R\0, 5 0 ‘4 MOIIV\ RXC A 10 1 A 1001 ‘40 ±23 X1’4I”\ I — CROSs. PRAL\SiP<VJ CR ‘40 (IL 0 ‘4? 1’ 1h 5/S LU vii N 1 ‘41 ‘4 ND CR1 11 ‘41 NI) 0 Mi ARY CD S 1 VI ) IC AJ\ACI\G FRI I I KNRIC i)i\1-i(Y\, K I’ IX) F’ I 51 \ 1 ‘41 ‘40 CL F) S 0 ‘‘uS \JI \5 L ] Rfl\ ) CC (‘1 ‘41 •i\ L NI ‘C V C S ‘ H i 0 1 S 1 I JIb Ifl TILT) / 1 ,J(.j ( I l\ ( I A(,A.NS TilE dl I)G1EN r .\NT) WARI) D\ I’ED: 1i ‘ 2ti07 P\SSEL) N 4 (Cfl R I’ ‘11:flcW( )LT1A\ l’l)CE. K 1\ O4PLS. I(flN AM) I O% N C ()MPI’ \% VI TQ\. 1 F 0 0 1 P )P StAL CU SE MLMI3LR. MAC I (Sfl H \O.2,. HAV’AlJ ‘hRF. 1111 4 L 1’ I ST IDKiN(. ( U 1’ V ...\lLt\( I ME\ r C UT Iltis appeal rnrnnig •‘n lot IIr.uuit. tb. ‘La. ‘lit ( Olin It’ii rred dir tnllnwlinz JUDGMENT Iliis ‘I1’’ I’.. b I.tjjilnflt ‘tt hint ( • 4 1 1 It n I (1 f)t l%1 Ic i ‘(I t It I u c I I t KSI’l C ;uhmr¼ KSR1’ 1 j%( flL ft it C di all I” lii IFA N” 4 442008 l’aileiigiit 11w ‘ en’ ‘ui’ jiId,2nlept ) I a i’(_ 4 lu ti lal teL (‘ii II’ g on (1 ‘1 114b1111 11 r It ‘i v i i III ; i LC.tl I tt ‘T. B — ‘it ‘i’,ii-t Va I)gsf j(;Ij ‘‘1i a.j);” d! ( tn 1t. ri1r’tiiC • ‘1I_i 1))11( (i’t .;(Iirfl1’ ‘1 i .Itlij 1 •‘ • . : ., 1 ., 3 :L \%Ii’ it .i hit’ leaina’cI C thhli%I-i .ipjwttrifl4 mi P ) I (I fll’c ) Ii 44 t I d Ii’s, tlw hS’ClC 1’, w’tii ;ui I tFit I a na ii. ITwietnrt-. it Will iF’I ‘‘)Iflt tiit’ ‘VtV ‘4 tib’ fl’iiit C ‘I TiC PiXel ii ti lit ni t nfl s. Tht-i 1 s. in to et in hit ii ut nil %1C 1 1 1 Itanwd (OUnSCI for i hi ippt’lla lit. 4 Th1 (UIfl vhhIe CiiSrJIi%iIlJ tht’ apI)tcJi of KSRT( h ‘ )fl i-n (1 It id.rn it ird of I-ic rr mi at o 11b113 1”! P ‘ctl (1V ot ) I- tj% ‘1. t’ciiisidri.aiioii in iii” apncai i’ Xhttti’ rIJI(IIbtI h hit e b ( I?!) hITfl ( C hlii1lt’il’.ltllfl rflhiiiijl L pi—i ‘. Ic — 1 1 ‘ i C I • t -1 ;I petI !i’.. fi’ i’’14Ia” ‘ ‘j..: hc ‘‘! ,, iti. ‘ :i-.j : ii i it) ‘1: el’— . t’ “r’1.- —..Ii . ;“.4’i I I . I) ‘ It tLi’i •‘ t It 4

A% pet E P. (.tIi1ti ci ilili. tilt. liItifllflt llci4i ‘._ii.t. r.1j eontu4’”’ of t ihi f ‘al:ti r qu enni isk” 11t ‘a. 1%t jun’ lIl,LIi1t% %tI’4L1flCLI l)V hun are also rvInit iron’ ‘HA ‘ ray N’ 271.’ ii; 2 “3. 7 nsiderl inn lii I thu ( t injuit i r b h ‘i 1/ uffnir again% R’.lO 000/ nar1frd LA tin ‘Inb’nnil tinder t)lj% bead. Rs. I 5.iMYi; an’arded I’ riibuai invard fl) “Pt F 11 ise:1 a al hil itiet d b 1 ft ‘e i’ p1’ Iüi 9 t ‘t’ .I • ii’ (jj ‘: !Ifl.. .h’ ün. .; I?% — jQ.) ) it 1 1 I i .‘t I S ‘lii .1 €1 € 5

The Thbunal calculating loss of leave in terms of salary has rightly awarded one month salary amounting to Rs.5.690/-, towards loss of Income during treatment period. The same Is Just and proper and there is no scope for enhancement.

Claimant after sustaining Injuries has continued his employment and there is no loss of future income. Therefore. awarding compensation towards loss of future income does not arise.

Rs. 5,000/- awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of amenities. in the absence of evidence of the doctor regarding disability is Just and proper and there is no scope for enhancement tinder this head.

Thus the claImant Is entitled for the following compensation: Pain and suffering 1) 2) Medical expenses 3) 4) IncIdental expenses Towards loss of income during laid tip l)eriod Rs. Towards loss of amenities Rs. 5) Rs. 25.000/- Rs. 15,000/- Rs. 5,000/-

5.690/- 5000/- Total Rs. 55,690/- 1 Less compensation awarded by the Tribunal Rs, 37,$9O/ Addli crnpen Con come to Rs 18 000j I il.. Aeeordini1v t..he appea I.is allowed hi. pa.rt a rid t,h.e Judrment: and award oi the Tribunal is modified •r •frw extent stated here in above. The claimant is entnleo for additional eorn.oensation of Its. I 8.OOO/- with intwe st at 6% p ‘ from the dam of elaim petition till the date oi realisation. 1 5. The KSRTC is directed toueposit the adctnonal e/ompensa ion arnonnc with nterest within rwo mont.hs from the. date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. a.nd the same is ordered to be released hi. favour ot claimant i fo Arneun.t hi. deposit is ordered to be t ra. nsterred. t:o the rn1 for disbursement. 5• order a.s to costs. r_r .r’