BANGALORE-560001 v. REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
(BY SMT. VAISHALI HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. …PETITIONER MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
VISVESHWARAIAH TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR JNANA SANGAMA, VTU MAIN ROAD, MACHHE, BELGAUM-590018.
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION NELSAN MANDELA MARG, VASANTH KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110070. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
H.K.B.K. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, NO.22/1, NEAR MANYATA TECH PARK, NAGAWARA, BENGALURU-560045. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:32089 WP No. 14781 of 2024 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRINCE ISAC, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. SANTHOSH S. NAGARALE, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2; SRI. H.R.SHOWRI, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3; SRI. M.D.RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 22.05.2024 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A WHEREBY THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER AS PROFESSOR AND HOD, CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS ARBITRARILY SOUGHT TO BE TERMINATED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
Operative part
2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.