KULSUM BI v. SHAHNAWAZ BEGUM
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
- Neutral citation
- 2026:KHC:17966
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO. 7 OF 2025 BETWEEN: KULSUM BI, W/O AMEER JAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BEEDI ROLLING WORK R/AT 2ND CROSS, SARDAR PALACE ROAD, G.C.R COLONY, TUMAKURU CITY - 572101. (BY SRI SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P, ADVOCATE) AND: SHAHNAWAZ BEGUM, W/O T.M. IQBAL AHMED, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT 2ND CROSS, G.C.R COLONY, TUMAKURU CITY, TUMAKURU - 572101. …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI MOHAMMED UMMAR FAROOQ, ADVOCATE) THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.46(1) OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.01.2023 PASSED IN HRC NO.2/2018 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT TUMAKURU., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.27 (1) (a) (r) OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999 FOR EVICTION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:17966 HRRP No. 7 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER This petition filed assailing the order dated
30.01.2023 in H.R.C. No.2/2018 on the file of I Additional Civil Judge, Tumakuru.
In terms of the said order passed under Section 27(1) (a) & (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, the petitioner's prayer for recovery of possession is allowed. The prayer for recovery of arrears of rent of Rs.7200/- is rejected.
Aggrieved by the said order, the respondent in the said petition is before this Court.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Execution Petition No.45/2023 on the file of I Additional Civil Judge, Tumakuru is closed pursuant to a memo filed by the decree holder. It is revealed from the official website that the case is settled in Lok Adalat on 30.12.2025.
This being the case, the Court is of the view that nothing survives for consideration. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:17966 HRRP No. 7 of 2025 HC-KAR
Operative part
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.