Karnataka State Road, Transport Corporation, Mysore Urban Division, Bannimantap, Mysore, By its v. Syed Mohammad Fazil
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of modifying the Award
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The respondent - Syed Mohammed Fazil, party-in-person is present. After Negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows: "The WP filed against the…
- Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of modifying the Award dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru in Ref. No.71/2016 vide Annexure 'K'. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER RAK 4 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP.…
Judgment
SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER W.P. No. 58115/2018 (Lok Adalat No.568/2024) BETWEEN: Karnataka State Road, Transport Corporation, Mysore Urban Division, Bannimantap, Mysore, By its Divisional Controller, Now represented by its Chief Law Officer. (By Smt. H R Renuka, Advocate) ...PETITIONER AND Syed Mohammad Fazil, S/o Khaji Mohammed Gaij, Adult, R/o. No. 195, I Stage, Nimra Masque Road, Rajiv Nagar, Mysuru-570001. (Respondent - Party-in-person - present) RESPONDENT 2 THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD DATED 14.12.2017 IN REF. NO. 71/2016 PASSED BY THE LABOUR COURT, MYSORE (ANNEXURE-K). THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru in Reference No.71/2016 dated 14.12.2017 Vide Annexure-K.
#2. The respondent - Syed Mohammed Fazil, party-in-person is present. After Negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows: "The WP filed against the Award in REF NO.71/2016 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru, dated 14.12.2017 has been referred to this Lok Adalat by the Hon'ble High Court U/S 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The parties to the appeal have settled their claim before the Lok Adalat on the following terms: 3 The Petitioner - KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the Respondent - workman into service with continuity of service, without consequential benefits, without back wages from the date of dismissal (30/09/2014) till the date of actual reinstatement. This settlement will not come in the way of corporation reopening the cases which were filed on account of dismissal of the respondent. Respondent - Workman has agreed for the said settlement".
#3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of modifying the Award dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru in Ref. No.71/2016 vide Annexure 'K'. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER RAK 4 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP. NO. 58115/2018 (LOK ADALATH NO. 568/2024) FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT PETITIONER: KSRTC AND: SYED MOHAMMAD FAZIL JOINT MEMO ….Petitioner/s …Repondent/s The WP filed against the Award in REF. NO. 71/2016 on the File of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru, dated 14/12/2017 has been referred to this LokAdalat by the Hon'ble High Court U/S.20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act.1987. The parties to the appeal have settled their claim before the Lok Adalat on the following terms: The Petitioner - KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the Respondent workman into service with continuity of service, without consequential benefits, without back wages from the date of dismissal (30/09/2014) till the date of actual reinstatement. This settlement will not come in the way of corporation reopening the cases which were filed on account of dismissal of the respondent. Respondent – Workman has agreed for the said settlement. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 25/01/2024 at Bengaluru Bench. Sd/- Sd/- SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of modifying the Award
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 14 Dec 2017. The bench was K S HEMALEKHA SRI P D SUBRAMANYA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.