M/S VINTEK R.F. PRODUCTS LTD ( IN LIQN) v. NIL
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Jun 2012
- Bench
- L NARAYANA SWAMY
Provisions considered
- Companies Act, 2013 s. 462(5)
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY COMPANY APPLICATION No.809 OF 2012 IN COMPANY PETITION No.41 OF 1996 BETWEEN : M/S VINTEK R.F. PRODUCTS LTD ( IN LIQN) REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CORPORATE BHAVAN, 12TH FLOOR RAHEJA TOWERS, NO.26-27, M G ROAD BANGALORE-560001 ( By Sri. K S MAHADEVAN & V JAYARAM ) ...APPLICANT AND : NIL ...RESPONDENT THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 462 OF THE 298 OF THE COMPANIES [COURT] RULES, 1956, PRAYING FOR APPOINTING AN AUDITOR TO AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDING 31.03.12 AND FIX HIS REMUNERATION & DISPENSING WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 462[5] OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND ETC., THIS APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS 2 DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Audit report dated 21st June 2012 submitted on behalf of the Official Liquidator is accepted.
As regards Auditor's fee is concerned, the same is fixed by this Court by its order dated 8th June 2007 passed in OLR No.211 of 2007. In the instant case also, the same is permitted to be paid to the Auditors.
The requirement, as contemplated under Section 462(5) of the Companies Act, is dispensed with.
Company Application is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013 — s. 462(5).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 21 Jun 2012. The bench was L NARAYANA SWAMY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.