✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. ANJANAPPA v. SMT.JAYAMMA

RFA No. 696 of 2026R NATARAJ

Case at a glance

Bench
R NATARAJ
Neutral citation
2026:KHC:18051

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2026 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. ANJANAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL, R/AT GOWDAHALLI COLONY, SHIVANAPURA POST, DASARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT PIN CODE NO.570091. (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI GOWDAR, ADVOCATE) …APPELLANT Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1.

SMT.JAYAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, PIN CODE NO.562125 OCCUPATION: NIL

2.

NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL

3.

VISHWANATH S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:18051 RFA No. 696 of 2026 HC-KAR RESPONDENTS NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT HOUSE CONSTRUCTED AT SITE NO.8, OF JANARA COLONY, ANDHRAHALLI VILLAGE, VISHWANEEDAM POST, YESHAVANATHAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, NOW BENGALURU-560091.

4.

YELLAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/AT NO.12/1, 3RD CROSS, JAYARAMA STREET, KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, R.S.PALYA, MS NAGARA, BENGALURU-560038. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.11.2025 PASSED IN OS.NO.1320/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:18051 RFA No. 696 of 2026 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT This is an appeal that arises out of a judgment and decree for partition. It is stated in the valuation slip that the total value of the property is Rs.10,00,000/- and the plaintiff's share works out to Rs.5,00,000/-.

2. In view of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, the appeal is to be tried by the District Court. Hence, the office is directed to return the appeal papers to the appellant and the appellant is permitted to present the same before the appropriate District Court.

3. For statistical purposes, this appeal is treated as closed in this Court. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RFA No. 696 of 2026). ← Search more judgments