SMT. LALITHAMMA v. LATE CHIKKAMMA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:36552
Provisions considered
- Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 s. 19(1)
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 14
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 773 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN:
SMT. LALITHAMMA D/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AND LATE CHIKKAMMA W/O CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS KARIKATTEHALLI BELUR TALUK, CHATCHATAHALLI HASSAN-573121
SMT PARVATHAMMA D/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AND LATE CHIKKAMMA W/O RUDREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS HOSAMANEHALLI KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK HASSAN-573121
SMT YALLAMMA D/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AND LATE CHIKKAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS KARIKATTEHALLI BELUR TLAUK, CHATCHATAHALLI HASSAN-573121 Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K. G., ADVOCATE) …APPELLANTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:36552 MFA No. 773 of 2024 HC-KAR AND: SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER HRP-2 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IST FLOOR HASSAN- 573 201. …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.03.2005 PASSED IN LAC NO.82/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DIVISION) HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED U/S.18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT The appellants claim amount is below Rs.10,00,000/. Therefore, the appeal is maintainable before the District Court as per Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964.
2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable before this Court. However, liberty is reserved to the appellants to file appeal before the District Court. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:36552 MFA No. 773 of 2024 HC-KAR
3. The time spent for prosecuting the appeal before this Court is excluded for the purpose of limitation as per Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Registry is directed to return all the original copies to the appellant. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.