SRI MANJUNATHA K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
(i) The petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 s. 29(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 99. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the above. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP
Judgment
(BY SMT. ASHWINI P., ADVOCATE) AND: … PETITIONER
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 01.
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER KHANIJA BHAVAN, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:22015 WP No. 10125 of 2026 HC-KAR RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE - 01.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NIMZ KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, OFFICE NO.14/3, 1ST FLOOR DRAVIDA BHAVAN BANGALORE (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1; SRI P.V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) … RESPONDENTS *** THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE GENERAL AWARD BEARING NO.SLAO/KIADB/BAN/NO.114/ 2012-13 DATED 17/01/2013 PASSED BY 3RD RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER WAS THE ABSOLUTE OWNER OF LAND BEARING SY NO. 12/12 MEASURING 0-15 GUNTAS, SY NO. 12/06 MEASURING 0-08 GUNTAS, SY NO. 10/15P-1 MEASURING 0-4.08 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT BILLINAKOTE VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, OF PETITIONER IS CONCERNED, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:22015 WP No. 10125 of 2026 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned AGA is directed to take notice for respondent no.1. Learned Counsel Sri.P.V.Chandrashekar accepts notice for respondent nos.2 and 3. The petitioner has sought for setting aside the General Award passed by the third respondent in respect of property of the petitioner bearing Sy.No.12/12 measuring 0.15 Guntas, Sy.No.12/6 measuring 0.08 Guntas and Sy.No.10/15P-1 measuring 0.4.08 Guntas, situated at Billinakote Village, Sompura Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is agreeable for acceptance of developed land as compensation in lieu of cash compensation and thereby the award could be passed in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short KIAD Act). - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:22015 WP No. 10125 of 2026 HC-KAR
3. It further submitted terms of Government Order dated 23.02.2021, developed land may be handed over to the petitioner in lieu of compensation and thereby the award could be passed in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short KIAD Act). It is further submitted that in terms of the Government Order dated 23.02.2021, developed land may be handed over to the petitioner in lieu of compensation.
Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to accept the developed land by way of a consent award, in terms of the Government Order dated
23.02.2021.
Learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 and 3 - KIADB submits that if the petitioner is willing to accept the compensation in accordance with the said Government Order dated 23.02.2021, the same will be considered by the authority in accordance with law. - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:22015 WP No. 10125 of 2026 HC-KAR
Operative part
In light of the said stand, taking note of the directions passed in W.P.No.36627/2025, the petition is disposed of as follows:
(i) The petition is allowed.
(ii) The impugned general award at Annexure-A insofar as the petitioner's land is concerned, is set aside.
(iii) Respondent No.3 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for passing of consent award and pass a consent award in terms of Section 29(2) of the KIAD Act, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
It is made clear that, in the event if there is any dispute with regard to entitlement and apportionment of the award amount, the general award at Annexure-A would stand revived. - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC:22015 WP No. 10125 of 2026 HC-KAR
Liberty reserved the Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB to withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Civil Court pursuant to the general award.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the above. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: (i) The petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 — s. 29(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.