Sri B.Gurumurthy v. Davanagere-Harihara Urban Development Authority
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S ABDUL NAZEER
Outcome
Dismissed
Writ petition is dismissed accordingly
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The submission of the learned Counsel for the parties is accepted. Writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE. BMM/-
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER WRIT PETITION NO.12863/2012(LB-RES) Between: Sri B.Gurumurthy, S/o Sri Kallappa, Aged about 50 years, R/a 1100-1101, ‘C’ 6th Cross, Shivakumara Swamy Extension, Hadadi Road, Davanagere. (By Sri A. Madhusudhana Rao, Adv.) And: …. Petitioner. Davanagere-Harihara Urban Development Authority, Sri Devaraja Urs Extension, A Block, BB Road, Davanagere – 577 006, Reptd. by its Commissioner. …. Respondent. (By M/s Niranjan Kumar A/S, Advs.) --- 2 This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the impugned Constitution of communication at Annexure ‘C’ dated 29.3.2012/31.3.2012, etc. India, praying to quash This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court passed the following: ORDER Having regard to the subsequent development, learned Counsel for the parties submit that the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Operative part
The submission of the learned Counsel for the parties is accepted. Writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE. BMM/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.