Mrs. Sadiqa Peerbhoy v. M/s. Comart Lithographers Ltd
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S ABDUL NAZEER
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER WRIT PETITION No.10069/2012 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Mrs. Sadiqa Peerbhoy W/o. Sri. Bunty Peerbhoy Aged about 62 years No.16/21, Binny Crescent Benson Town Bangalore 560 046 (By Sri. Chandrashekara. K. Adv.) AND:
M/s. Comart Lithographers Ltd. No.73-23/ 1, Konena Agrahara HAL Post Bangalore 560 017 Rep. by its General Manager Sri. Shivakurnar ... PETITIONER
M/s. MAA Print and Production Limited No.6, Airport Service Road Domlur Layout Bangalore 560 017 Rep. by Chairman Sri. Bunty Peerbhoy ... RESPONDENTS 2 (By M/s. Kamath and Kamath, Adv. for R I Notice to R-2 dispensed with) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 1.3.2012 as per Annexure-A and etc. This writ petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following: ORDER In this case, the petitioner has called in question the validity of the order dated 1.3.20 12 in Ex.P. No.2217/2010 on the file of the City Civil Judge, Bangalore.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order has been recalled by the Executing Court on 16.4.2012. He has filed a memo along with a copy of the order sheet of the Court below dated 16.4.2012. which shows that the impugned order has already been recalled. Hence, this writ petition does not survive for consideration. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Cs/ Sd/ JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.