✦ Karnataka High Court

LAKSHMAMMA v. B.A. RAMAIAH SHETTY

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Judgment

#1. LAKSHMAMMA W/O.LATE PILAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

#2. BHAGYAMMA, W/O.GOVINDA GOWDA, D/O. LATE PILAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

#3. NAGAMANI, W/O. MARIYAPPA, D/O. LATE PILAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

#4. P. SURESH BABU, S/O. LATE PILAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: High Court of Karnataka ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF HOOVALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MURALI N., ADV.) AND: B.A. RAMAIAH SHETTY, S/O LATE ACHAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT. SRINIVASA NILAYA, NEAR DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE, KOLAR CITY, KOLAR-563101. (BY SRI. DR. M. SUNIL SASTRY., ADV.) …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9484 RSA No. 373 of 2015 THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 20.11.2014 IN R.A.NO.165/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD: 16.7.2012 PASSED IN OS. NO. 650/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., KOLAR. PASSED THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT On 25.04.2024, respondent has filed a memo reporting death of respondent No.1 namely Sri. B R Chandrashekar in RSA No.371/2015 who died on

17.01.2023 and also reported death of sole respondent namely Sri. B A Ramaiah Shetty in RSA No.373/2015 who died on 13.11.2019. Till date, steps are not taken. Hence, appeal in RSA No.373/2015 is dismissed as abated. SSD Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RSA No. 373 of 2015). ← Search more judgments