✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. MD. SALEEM v. THE SECRETARY

WP No. 1640 of 2024RAVI V HOSMANI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 1640 OF 2024 (MV) BETWEEN: SRI. MD. SALEEM S/O MD. ABID SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, PROP: MERCHANT TRANSPORTS, KOBBARIPET, HOSADURGA, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. (BY SRI. A.S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TURUVUNUR ROAD, CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

2.

SRI. B.P. DAYANAND S/O PARAPPA B.R., AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, PROP RAMESHWARA MOTORS, MATHODU, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. (BY SRI. R. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2; SMT. WAHEEDA, AGA FOR R1) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:34896 WP No. 1640 of 2024 HC-KAR THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS QUASH THE ORDER/ENDORSEMENT PASSED BY THE R1 DATED 27.4.2022 IN RENEWING THE PERMIT NO.24/86-87 FROM 7.12.2021 TO 8.12.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a Memo signed by petitioner stating that Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed.

2. Taking Memo on record, Writ Petition dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 CT: BHK

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 1640 of 2024). ← Search more judgments