MR. P.K. CHETHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH WRIT PETITION NO. 7714 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
1. MR. P.K. CHETHAN S/O P.R. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.12, NEAR SREE RAMA TEMPLE BUS STOP, PANATTURU, BENGALURU-560103. (BY SRI. MAHESH KIRAN SHETTY S., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:47326 WP No. 7714 of 2023 HC-KAR
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE WHITEFIELD DIVISION, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU - 560 066.
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER MARATHAHALLI POLICE STATION, MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 037 REPT BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N.SUDEVE HEGDE, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO.YV/DCP/CRM/18/2023 DATED
17.03.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER FROM THE REGISTER OF ROWDY LIST BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 13.01.2023 VIDE ANNX-H AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:47326 WP No. 7714 of 2023 HC-KAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition no longer survives in view of the subsequent events as the petitioner has been removed from the list of rowdy proceedings by the police.
2. Considering the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.