(BY SRI. ASWATHAPPA D.,ADVOCATE) v. BENGALURU-560 020
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Judgment
(BY SRI. ASWATHAPPA D.,ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:
THE COMMISSIONER THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENALURU-560 020.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BDA, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B VACHAN.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATIONS DATED 02.11.2020 AS PER ANNEXURE-A REPRESENTATION DATED 13.07.2022 AS PER - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:927 WP No. 7563 of 2023 ANNEXURE-C AND REPRESENTATION DATED 18.08.2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ALLOT AND CONVEY A SITE MEASURING 30X40 FEET UNDER THE INCENTIVE SCHEME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Sri. Aswathappa D, learned counsel petitioner submits in view of the disposal of the writ petition in W.P.No.7580/2023, the present petition be dismissed as not pressed.
2. Submission is taken on record.
Operative part
In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.