SMT. KAVITHARAJ v. COURT OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. THE CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD NEAR ORION MALL RAJAJINAGAR 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560 010 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANU K, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1 & R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 657 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. KAVITHARAJ W/O S.A. PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.12, SAVIRAJ MANSION MAHESHWARI NAGAR MAHADEVAPURA BENGALURU-560 048 (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD NEAR ORION MALL DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD RAJAJINAGAR, 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560 010 - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:5524 WP No. 657 of 2022 HC-KAR
Operative part
THE CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD NEAR ORION MALL RAJAJINAGAR 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560 010 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANU K, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1 & R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO DISPOSSESS THE PETITIONER FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Sri. Sachin B.S, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 27.01.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under; learned counsel " The for the petitioner, on instruction from the petitioner, seeks permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present petition as not pressed. Hence, the petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice and equity.'' - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:5524 WP No. 657 of 2022 HC-KAR Memo signed by the counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.