✦ Karnataka High Court

Asgar Au v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.626/2012 BETWEEN: Asgar Au Sb Abdul Jaleel Sab T.H.Road Gourapura. Ajjampura Post Chickrnagalur Post. (By Sri N.Rajashekar, Advocate) AND: The Regional Transport Officer Chikmagalur. (By Sri Vijaykumar Majage, HCGP) ... Petitioner ... Respondent This petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the condition imposed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge. Chikmagalur, in his order dated 15.12.2011 in CrLA.No.165/2011 while suspending the conviction sentence, fine amount passed by the I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Chikmagalur in C.C.No. 142 1/2006 order dated 31.10.2011. This petition coming on for admission this day, Court made the following: ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that, time granted by the I—appellate court to deposit the fine amount has already expired. Therefore, if one month time is granted, petitioner would deposit the fine amount with the trial court. His submission is recorded.

#2. The benefit of interim order passed by the I—appellate court would be available to the petitioner, if he were to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- with the trial court within a period of one month from today.

#3. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Np! Sd/ JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments