SRI M .KESHAVA v. SMT VIJAYA @ VEENA

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA BETWEEN: MFA No.1046/2012 (MC) SRI M .KESHAVA S/O.LATE MANAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O.NAGALAPURA VILLAGE, ADDADAPOST, KOPPA TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DIST- 577 126. (By SRI. H.N.PRAKASH, ADV.,) AND: SMT VIJAYA @ VEENA D/O. MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS WORKER IN A PRIVATE FIRM, NOW R/AT.GEREKATTE VILLAGE, KONANDOOR POST, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK -577 432. (By SRI. H. MALATESH, ADV.) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-* ...APPELLANT. .. RESPONDENT. THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.12.2011 PASSED IN M.C.NO.10/2010 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SHIMOGA, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1a) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT FOR DIVORCE. THIS MFA IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, N.K.PATIL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 J U D G M E N T This appeal arises out of the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 15.12.2011 passed in M.C.No.10/2010 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Shimoga.

#2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has filed a memo dated

07.06.2012 submitting the documents, i.e., marriage certificate, marriage invitation card and marriage photo to show that the respondent married one Vishwanath K. The same is placed on record.

#3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant at the outset fairly submitted that in view of the statements made in the memo, the appeal filed by the appellant has become infructuous and that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous reserving liberty to redress his grievance before the appropriate forum. His submission is placed on record. 3

#4. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to the appellant to redress his grievance before the appropriate forum, if he so advised. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE AGV.