B.S.Nagappa & Ors. v. Managing Director, KSRTC
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The delay in filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained by showing sufficient cause and the same is accepted. For the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application, this Misc. Cvl. is allowed. Delay of 392 days in filing the appeal is condoned…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL MISC.CVL.639 OF 2011 IN M.F.A.No. 411 OF 2011 (MV) Between: B.S.Nagappa, And others (By Smt. C.G. Asha Devi, Advocate) … Appellants And : Managing Director, KSRTC ... Respondent (By Shri. F.S. Dabali, Advocate) ***** This Misc. Cvl. is filed under Section 173(2) Provision 11 of the M.V. Act, 1988 praying to condone the delay of 392 days in filing the above appeal, in the interest of justice and equity. This Misc. Cvl. coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following: O R D E R This Misc. Cvl. is filed by the counsel for appellants for condoning the delay of 392 days in filing the appeal. 2
#2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for appellants and learned counsel appearing Corporation.
#3. The delay in filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained by showing sufficient cause and the same is accepted. For the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application, this Misc. Cvl. is allowed. Delay of 392 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the appellants shall not be entitled to any interest for the said period, if they succeed in the appeal. SD/- JUDGE BMV*
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.